Re: [SUBMIT] Digester matching rules test case

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Scott Sanders wrote:

> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:16:00 -0700
> From: Scott Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] Digester matching rules test case
>
> Patches are always welcome.  As long as the test can still run, the
> build.xml patch would be appreciated ;-)
>

In particular, I might be a stick in the mud, but I'd like it to still run
on the Ant 1.3 production release :-).  As long as that works, I'm fine
with updating to Ant's internal JUnit task.

The reason it's not that way already is primarily because I had problems
with Ant class loading when running unit tests in Tomcat, so when I stated
cutting and pasting ......

> Scott
>

Craig


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:58 PM
> Subject: [SUBMIT] Digester matching rules test case
>
>
> > this is an additional test case aimed at matching rules.
> > it takes the (two) original matching rules tests defined in the basic
> > DigesterTestCase
> > and adds another couple.
> > the main reason for separating out from the basic DigesterTestCase is that
> > this class should allow subclasses to test extensions of the basic
> > matching rules.
> >
> > i was going to remove the duplicate tests from DigesterTestCase but i don'
> > t see any real harm in keeping them around (for the moment).
> >
> > i couldn't help noticing that the build.xml uses a <java> (ant) task to
> > perform the tests. the latest version of ant has quite a nice task that
> > does junit testing that i've used before and i think works pretty well.
> > the patch for the build script uses the existing method but i'd be willing
> > to provide a patch converting it to use the ant junit tasks if people
> > think that's a good idea.
> >
> > - robert
> >
> > <Attachment missing><Attachment missing><Attachment missing>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
>
> > this is an additional test case aimed at matching rules.
> > it takes the (two) original matching rules tests defined in the basic
> > DigesterTestCase
> > and adds another couple.
> > the main reason for separating out from the basic DigesterTestCase is that
> > this class should allow subclasses to test extensions of the basic
> > matching rules.
> >
> > i was going to remove the duplicate tests from DigesterTestCase but i don'
> > t see any real harm in keeping them around (for the moment).
> >
> > i couldn't help noticing that the build.xml uses a <java> (ant) task to
> > perform the tests. the latest version of ant has quite a nice task that
> > does junit testing that i've used before and i think works pretty well.
> > the patch for the build script uses the existing method but i'd be willing
> > to provide a patch converting it to use the ant junit tasks if people
> > think that's a good idea.
> >
> > - robert
> >
> >
>
>