Rodney Waldhoff
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 05:24:43 -0700
>i couldn't help noticing that the build.xml uses a <java> (ant) task to >perform the tests. the latest version of ant has quite a nice task that >does junit testing that i've used before and i think works pretty well. >>In particular, I might be a stick in the mud, but I'd like it to still run >>on the Ant 1.3 production release :-). As long as that works, I'm fine >>with updating to Ant's internal JUnit task. I'm all for the <junit> task actually (it gives better output among other features), but in the spirit of "Don't take down a fence unless you know the reason it was put up in the first place", just a reminder: We had originally set up several of the commons build scripts to use the <junit> task rather than a <java> task, and then changed it back because the former required a particular (although not difficult) configuration of Ant to work properly (namely setting up the junit task itself), while <java> simply required the right classpath. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp