Scott Sanders
Thu, 06 Sep 2001 09:31:20 -0700
+1 for any change, either A or B. Scott Sanders ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change commons mailing-list name > "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to have your vote on the following possibilities : > > > > A) Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That would be preferable... > > > B) Only create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is also "allowed"... Just know that you'll end up with most of your > "developers" brainstorming cluttered with users post, and you can't just say > "get off and post to the users list" :) :) :) > > > C) Only create a [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not sure it is "legal" ?) > > Nope... :( I wouldn't like that... > > > D) Make [EMAIL PROTECTED] points to commons-dev@... (or > > commons@... if this is chosen) for some time (let's say 1 month) and then > > remove jakarta-commons@... altogether. > > Well, right now commons-dev@jakarta is an alias to jakarta-commons, we could > reverse it.. > > > Here is my +1 vote for A and D. > > I'm no committer, but I like your votes... > > BTW, I can simply resubscribe everyone from one to the other, there's no > need to unsub from one and manually sub to the new list... I'll just "move" > things smoothly (you won't even notice the difference!) > > Let me know the outcomes, please :) > > Pier > >