Last time I looked, both C and C++ had runtime code -- I suppose
one could dispute that that code created a runtime environment. I
wouldn't argue with that.
And if the design of an API is so complex that the average programmer can't
understand how to use it is the hallmark of good design -- well then you win --
BufferedImage great design.
jav...@javadesktop.org wrote:
The first thing that you will have to understand is
that Java is going to be slower than anything except maybe Flash.
If your goal s to be as fast as C, C++, C# or .Net then you should
find another goal
because it is already a given that Java will be slower.
You mix up runtime enviroments and languages. However nice try.
> But your experiments are important because they will
reveal the flaws and
inconsistencies in Java2D, BufferedImage and ImageIO.
Just because their design is too flexible for you to understand, doesn't mean
its flawed.
- Clemens
[Message sent by forum member 'linuxhippy' (linuxhippy)]
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=349645
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
lists...@java.sun.com and include in the body of the message "help".
