Jon Stevens
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:20:08 -0800
on 2/22/01 4:17 PM, "Santiago Gala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All of the java.security.* framework is interface based. So is Turbine's. I really don't see a need to use java.security.* when Turbine has a *MUCH* more complete implementation of a security framework than just java.security. -1 on java.security.* -jon -- If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take your pain to new levels. --Anonymous <http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/> && <http://java.apache.org/turbine/> -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed@list.working-dogs.com/> List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]