Peter Samuelson wrote: > > The more I think about it, the more I think the default if_dep should > do the m-restricting thing. That way: > > dep_bool FOO1 BAR BAZ > dep_mbool FOO2 BAR BAZ > dep_tristate FOO3 BAR BAZ > > is exactly equivalent to > > if_dep BAR BAZ > bool FOO1 > mbool FOO2 > tristate FOO3 > fi_dep > > Of course, that requires the invention of 'mbool'. [...] Hmmm. I'm > still thinking about this one.
Interesting idea. You'd then have the property of preserving semantics across a particular simple textual rearrangement, but only a single type of "if"-like statement. Greg. -- the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail, with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
