On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > kbuild. > > The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: > ... > > o add script to find unused kconfig symbols (try it!) > > based on my experiences with this, unless you filter carefully, you're > going to end up with a *whack* of false positives given the number of > developers who elect to name their local macros starting with a prefix > of "CONFIG_". good luck dealing with *that*. :-)
I saw you patches about that kconfig symbols usage, your developments of *the* script. I also happened to see `linux-2.4.X/checkconfig.pl`. Now somebody else proposed something related to kbuild tree. So, what was your point in doing that, why your work didn't ended up in `linux/scripts/'? > rday _____ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
