William J. Foristal
Thu, 2 Apr 1998 12:03:51 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 08:22:12 -0500 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> >moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> >> >> Hi Jackie, >> >> >> >> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge >Wright based >> >> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male >employer >> >> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss >it does not >> >> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable >tort. That >> >> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes >what an >> >> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that. >> >> >> >> Do you agree? >> >> >> > >> >Mornin' Terry, >> > I think you need to read the decision. >> >...Mac >> >> Hi Mac, >> >> Here I will read it to you. This is extracted from the decision: >> >> "In addressing the issues in this case, the Court has viewed the >record in the >> light most favorable to the plaintiff and given her the benefit of >all >> reasonable factual inferences, which is required at this stage of >the >> proceedings." >> Best, Terry >> > >Mornin', > That does nothing to support your claim. There is nothing in her >decision that warrants > >a charge of prejudice. >...Mac > >HI Mac, Wow, that was sure a short decision that Terry posted. Surely Judge Wright said more than that..... :) Bill _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues