Jackie Fellows
Thu, 2 Apr 1998 18:57:49 -0500
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: moonshine wrote: > moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Hi Jackie, > > > > Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based > > her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer > > showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it does not > > constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable tort. That > > is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what an > > outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that. > > > > Do you agree? > > > > Mornin' Terry, > I think you need to read the decision. > ...Mac > Hi Mac But that would cause cognitive dissonance ;) jackief > Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues -- In the sociology room the children learn that even dreams are colored by your perspective I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room" Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues