L&I Re: Another Victim of the VRWC

[William J. Foristal]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:


Hi Jackie,

Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!  I believe that was the sound of
another slam dunk I just heard. :)

Bill


On Fri, 03 Apr 1998 04:23:24 -0600 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Poor Terry
>
>I bet it is hard to be the correct interpreter of the legal decision 
>reached by
>Judge Wright.  I wonder why the majority of legal experts, both 
>Republican and
>Democrat, agree that based on the evidence presented by her legal 
>beagles, Paula did
>not have a case.  Wright did not define sexual harassment, it was 
>already defined in
>the law and she followed the law.
>
>Of course, perhaps, one reason you are having problems in seeing the 
>forest for the
>trees is that you are not reading the criteria that Wright had to use 
>in making her
>decision.  The part that led to the decision was the failure to 
>provide evidence
>that she suffered more than a reasonable person can expect.  There are 
>two parts to
>the law her attornies filed under that must meet the standards.  The 
>act and the
>consequences of the act.  In this case, she did not meet the standards 
>set out in
>law regarding the consequences of Bill's alleged act.    Wright has to 
>follow the
>legal definition of sexual harrassment, not the definition that you or 
>others decide
>is the accurate decision.  If you know anything about law then you 
>know that.  In
>this case, IMO, Wright was following the 'letter of the law,' which 
>she was correct
>in doing.
>
>jackief
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Oh Jackie,
>>
>> Judge Wright decided such things were not sexual harassment.  She 
>did not
>> decide on the merits of the evidence regarding Jones' description of
>> Clinton's conduct.
>> Judge Wright decided much more flagrant behaviour by Clinton as 
>presumed
>> true by the requirements of the summary judgment was not 
>"outrageous"
>>
>> If the representative had had the same ruling he would have not had 
>to face
>> removal from office and criminal prosecution.  If he had the same 
>supporters
>> Clinton has his approval would have soared and he might have planned 
>a
>> bright future.
>> Best,     Terry
>>
>> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law"  - The Devil's 
>Dictionary
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
>
>--
>In the sociology room the children learn
>that even dreams are colored by your perspective
>
>I toss and turn all night.    Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues