Sue Hartigan
Fri, 3 Apr 1998 23:32:00 -0500
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Jackie: As far as I know there is no legit reason for assault weapons. Certainly not for hunting. In LA the sergeants (cops) had to get special permission to carry M-16 A2 Service rifles because they were outgunned by the bad guys. There is also a special unit of the SWAT team that has these, but can only use them with permission from higher ups. Of course a lot of the bad guys already have them, and no permission is needed for them to use them. <TIC> Sue Sue > Hi Bill > > I know that there are good arguments on both sides of the camp on this > issue. I grew up with guns in the house all my life and my girls were taught > gun safety and the whole works. I shoot although not the greatest and Ed is > a target shooter. Of course, we do not have children in the house and our > dobes are a pretty good protection system against them getting stolen. We > have a number of LE friends who Ed shoots with and I enjoy the outings. So > it would be difficult for me, personally, to support the banning of guns even > though I see they do have some valid points and see how often guns are so > readily available for those who shouldn't have guns. The assault weapons are > something else entirely though--this IMO should not even be manufactured. > > jackief -- Two rules in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know. 2. Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues