legal-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2005/02/22 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Felipe Leme
• 2005/02/18 RE: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jim Barnett
• 2005/02/18 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Issac Goldstand
• 2005/02/17 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jennifer Machovec
• 2005/02/17 Re: Lawyers deciding :) Was: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jim Jagielski
• 2005/02/17 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Julie MacNaught
• 2005/02/17 Re: The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] onReply-To on legal-discuss) Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/17 Re: The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss) Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/17 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/16 Fwd: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jochen Wiedmann
• 2005/02/16 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Phil Steitz
• 2005/02/16 Lawyers deciding :) Was: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Henri Yandell
• 2005/02/16 RE: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Noel J. Bergman
• 2005/02/16 RE: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Noel J. Bergman
• 2005/02/16 RE: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Stephen McConnell
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Brett Porter
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Ted Husted
• 2005/02/16 RE: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Cliff Schmidt
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Andrew C. Oliver
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jason Hunter
• 2005/02/16 Re: The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] onReply-To on legal-discuss) Jason Hunter
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss David Crossley
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/16 RE: The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] onReply-To on legal-discuss) Cliff Schmidt
• 2005/02/16 The reason I am against setting Reply-To (was Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss) Brian W. Fitzpatrick
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Jeremy Boynes
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Ralph Goers
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Mark Thomas
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Brian W. Fitzpatrick
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss peter royal
• 2005/02/16 Re: [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Serge Knystautas
• 2005/02/16 [VOTE] on Reply-To on legal-discuss Rodent of Unusual Size
• 2005/02/16 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/16 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Brian W. Fitzpatrick
• 2005/02/16 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Rodent of Unusual Size
• 2005/02/16 Re: Reply-To on legal-discuss Brian W. Fitzpatrick
• 2005/02/16 Reply-To on legal-discuss Rodent of Unusual Size
• 2005/02/16 Re: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Rodent of Unusual Size
• 2005/02/16 RE: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/16 RE: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/02/16 RE: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Jim Barnett
• 2005/02/16 Re: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Rodent of Unusual Size
• 2005/02/16 RE: Spec sources in Geronimo Jim Barnett
• 2005/02/16 Re: Spec sources in Geronimo Jeremy Boynes
• 2005/02/16 Re: tools to fix Apache License headers Jeremias Maerki
• 2005/02/16 Re: tools to fix Apache License headers Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/16 Re: Spec sources in Geronimo Brian McCallister
• 2005/02/16 Re: tools to fix Apache License headers Jeremias Maerki
• 2005/02/16 [Fwd: Re: Spec sources in Geronimo] Jeremy Boynes
• 2005/02/16 Fwd: tools to fix Apache License headers Jennifer Machovec
• 2005/02/16 Re: FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Jennifer Machovec
• 2005/02/16 Re: Spec sources in Geronimo Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/16 Re: Spec sources in Geronimo Brian McCallister
• 2005/02/16 Spec sources in Geronimo Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/15 FW: tools to fix Apache License headers Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/02/11 RE: tools to fix Apache License headers Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/02/11 Re: tools to fix Apache License headers David Crossley
• 2005/02/10 RE: tools to fix Apache License headers Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/02/10 tools to fix Apache License headers David Crossley
• 2005/02/09 Re: myCompany copyright Simon Kitching
• 2005/02/09 Re: myCompany copyright Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/02/09 myCompany copyright John Hawkins
• 2005/02/07 Re: VaudTax strikes again: distributed with no ASF license (to be confirmed) Bertrand Delacretaz
• 2005/02/05 Re: About Doug Lea's concurrent package. Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/05 Re: About Doug Lea's concurrent package. Henri Yandell
• 2005/02/05 About Doug Lea's concurrent package. Trustin Lee
• 2005/02/03 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Brett Porter
• 2005/02/03 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/02/03 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Simon Kitching
• 2005/01/29 Re: VaudTax strikes again: distributed with no ASF license (to be confirmed) Martin van den Bemt
• 2005/01/29 Re: VaudTax strikes again: distributed with no ASF license (to be confirmed) Bertrand Delacretaz
• 2005/01/29 VaudTax strikes again: distributed with no ASF license (to be confirmed) Bertrand Delacretaz
• 2005/01/29 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Nicola Ken Barozzi
• 2005/01/28 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/28 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Noel J. Bergman
• 2005/01/28 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/24 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/01/24 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/24 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/24 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Niclas Hedhman
• 2005/01/24 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". acoliver
• 2005/01/24 Re: Usage of LGPL libraries ? Paul Libbrecht
• 2005/01/23 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/21 Re: Potential Issues in Tomcat codebase Roy T. Fielding
• 2005/01/21 Re: Potential Issues in Tomcat codebase Jason Hunter
• 2005/01/21 Re: Potential Issues in Tomcat codebase Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/01/21 Potential Issues in Tomcat codebase Mark Thomas
• 2005/01/21 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Jeffrey Thompson
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Simon Kitching
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Glen Stampoultzis
• 2005/01/20 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/01/19 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Jeffrey Thompson
• 2005/01/18 Re: Licence required in javadoc output? Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/18 Licence required in javadoc output? Simon Kitching
• 2005/01/16 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/01/15 RE: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Noel J. Bergman
• 2005/01/14 Re: Usage of LGPL libraries ? Paul Libbrecht
• 2005/01/14 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/14 RE: Usage of LGPL libraries ? Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/01/14 RE: Usage of LGPL libraries ? Jim Barnett
• 2005/01/14 Re: Usage of LGPL libraries ? Justin Erenkrantz
• 2005/01/14 Usage of LGPL libraries ? Paul Libbrecht
• 2005/01/12 Interview about Open Source and IBM's 500 patents Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/01/11 Re: Public Domain Software Phil Steitz
• 2005/01/11 RE: Public Domain Software Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/01/11 Re: Public Domain Software Jeffrey Thompson
• 2005/01/11 RE: Public Domain Software Jim Barnett
• 2005/01/11 RE: Public Domain Software Lawrence Rosen
• 2005/01/11 Re: Public Domain Software Brian Behlendorf
• 2005/01/10 Public Domain Software Phil Steitz
• 2005/01/04 Novell licence Henri Yandell
• 2005/01/01 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/12/31 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2004/12/31 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/12/30 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2004/12/30 Regarding Java and the LGPL (fwd) Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/12/30 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/12/30 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf
• 2004/12/27 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Torsten Curdt
• 2004/12/22 Re: LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Henri Yandell
• 2004/12/21 LGPL and "the Hibernate clause". Brian Behlendorf

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]