sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 08:54 joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com> napisao je:
> > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). > This is an interesting case. I think we are allowed to spot errors using closed sources, but we can not use the source to say what is the right solution. It's as if we are looking for differences between models, and then using only the difference data to look further into the matter using other sources (survey, Bing..). This is interesting to me because I was thinking about making a service that lists differences between OSM data and outside closed source data, and then showing only what is different. Then people would use that "difference data" to direct their mapping efforts. For example, take closed data about opening hours, compare to OSM, and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK? Janko
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
