Hi Dan, The English version, at least, appears less restrictive than CC BY 4.0, and closer to the Canada Open Government License. The license is not specific as to the type of attribution required. The conservative route, is, as Frederik said, to ask the agency if attribution on the osm.org/copyright webpage is acceptable. If it is, then I see no other barriers to using the data. You might also ask the opinion of the Licensing Working Group at legal-questi...@osmfoundation.org Best, Kathleen
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:34 AM Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/25/2017 01:38 AM, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > What do you folks think about > > http://data.gov.tw/license#eng ? > > Can we use that data? > > Not without further clarification. The way in which we would use the > data could be seen as violating their 3.2: "[The user] must make an > explicit notice of statement as attribution requested in the Exhibit > below by the Data Providing Organization". We *can* make such an > explicit notice on our osm.org/copyright page but we cannot ensure that > anyone who downloads our data or who looks at our map sees that notice. > We have to ask them if that kind of notice is enough. > > This is a similar issue as we always have with CC-BY licensed data. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
