OK thanks Simon for the clarification! I'll ask the participants of https://www.facebook.com/groups/odtwn/permalink/1927450013936074/?comment_id=1927539973927078 and https://discuss.okfn.org/t/license-approval-request-open-government-data-license-taiwan-1-0/4593/12 to chime in here to get this straightened out!
>>>>> "SP" == Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> writes: SP> As has already been pointed out 3.2 could be problematic. The SP> translation is a bit wobbly and unclear, but if I understand it SP> correctly the intent is to reference a data set specific attribution SP> requirement that would naturally have to be looked at for any specific SP> data use. SP> The really killer is however 6.3 (which should have a different section SP> header) which I suspect is incompatible with the Open Definition and a SP> lot of other stuff (including common sense :-)). SP> Simon _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk