legal  

Messages by Thread

• Google did not reverse engineer Java thufir
• RE: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thufir
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thomas Charron
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
• Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Robinson Tryon
  • parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Robinson Tryon
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Robinson Tryon
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Neil Brown
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thufir
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thufir
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Robinson Tryon
  • Re: parse Alsup decision: any, all, some was Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thomas Charron
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thomas Charron
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Robinson Tryon
• ArgoSoftware Harry Miller
• GNU/Linux kernel GPL violation | Turkey | Android Mahmut Can
• Motorola in violation of multiple GPL projects with the Blink-1 Baby Camera Joe Gullo
• GNU/Linux kernel GPL violation Turkey Android Mahmut Can
• Is Glare Technologies in violation of the GPL? Agathe Ricci
  • Re: Is Glare Technologies in violation of the GPL? Clemens Ladisch
  • Re: Is Glare Technologies in violation of the GPL? Clemens Ladisch
  • Re: Is Glare Technologies in violation of the GPL? Hendrik Weimer
• Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Bug Ficks
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Wiedemann, Claus-Peter
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Bug Ficks
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Bug Ficks
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Bug Ficks
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Stijn Devriendt
  • Re: Samsung (L)GPL violation (FFmpeg/SmartTV) Engel Nyst
• Toshiba just holds me out [email protected]
  • Re: Toshiba just holds me out Armijn Hemel
• exfat and patents Dan Pasanen
  • Re: exfat and patents Jeroen Massar
  • Re: exfat and patents Stijn Devriendt
  • Re: exfat and patents Jeremy Meiss
• Calling GPLed software proprietary David Hyde
  • Re: Calling GPLed software proprietary Clemens Ladisch
  • Re: Calling GPLed software proprietary Ian Stirling
• Advice for initial contact Julius Schwartzenberg
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Ian Stirling
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Arnt Karlsen
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Julius Schwartzenberg
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Chris DiBona
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Ian Stirling
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: Advice for initial contact Julius Schwartzenberg
• Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Fernando Cassia
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Neil Brown
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Joshua Gay
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? TJ
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Richard Fontana
  • 答复: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Shenfen (Navia)
  • Re: 答复: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision?ramifications? Richard Fontana
  • Re: 答复: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision ramifications? Pamela Chestek
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Kern Sibbald
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Florian Weimer
  • AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Wiedemann, Claus-Peter
  • Re: AW: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Florian Weimer
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Ian Stirling
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Neil Brown
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Ian Stirling
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thomas Charron
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision Thufir
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision lkcl .
  • Re: Oracle vs Google: APIs are copyright; appeal decision thufir
• NordicTrack possible GPL violation Schneider, George H
  • Re: NordicTrack possible GPL violation Robinson Tryon
• R-Link Source-code request TJ
• Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Eric D
  • RE: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Eric Appleman
  • Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Joseph Heenan
  • RE: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Eric Appleman
  • Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 SonWon
  • Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Thomas Charron
  • Re: legal Digest, Vol 111, Issue 9 Eric Appleman
• I don't understand why you can't let go Simon Stapleton
  • Re: I don't understand why you can't let go Ralph Corderoy
• GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Cole Johnson
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) udo
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Joseph Heenan
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • RE: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Andrew Katz
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Joseph Heenan
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) udo
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • RE: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Andrew Katz
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Solomon Peachy
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Richard Fontana
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Richard Fontana
  • beyond-copyright GPL enforcement mechanisms (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • RE: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Andrew Katz
  • the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Robinson Tryon
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Robinson Tryon
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: the backchannel politics of GPL enforcement Bradley M. Kuhn
  • GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault(R-Link system)) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault(R-Link system)) Richard Fontana
  • Re: GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault(R-Link system)) Smith, McCoy
  • Re: GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault(R-Link system)) Richard Fontana
  • Re: GPL enforcement in practice (was Re: GPL violation by Renault(R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Neil Brown
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Joshua Gay
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Joshua Gay
  • initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Neil Brown
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Robinson Tryon
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Kern Sibbald
  • Re: initial violation information collecting Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Kern Sibbald
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Neil Brown
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Kern Sibbald
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Richard Fontana
  • Re: initial violation information collecting (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Kern Sibbald
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Ralph Corderoy
  • Other methods of GPL enforcement (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Daniel Berlin
  • Volume of GPL enforcement (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: Volume of GPL enforcement (was Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system)) Daniel Berlin
  • Re: Volume of GPL enforcement Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) TJ
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
  • Re: GPL violation by Renault (R-Link system) Marc Dietrich
• Re: Yet another GPL violation from the Anthrax crew (Android > kernels) Nuno Brito
  • Re: Yet another GPL violation from the Anthrax crew (Android > kernels) SonWon
  • Re: Yet another GPL violation from the Anthrax crew (Android > kernels) Eric Appleman

• Earlier messages