> What is wrong with such persons? This is insane.
What's wrong with Samsung I'd rather ask ... that mail has backfired, hasn't it ? However, glad that it got resolved. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Andrei Frumusanu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > It has come to my attention that a recent internal leak of Samsung's > kernel-space exFat driver implementation has been making the rounds around > the web. Nothing we can do about that, what is out, is out. > > However a certain user "rxrz" went a bit too far with his actions: > > https://github.com/rxrz/exfat-**nofuse<https://github.com/rxrz/exfat-nofuse> > > He basically has stripped the original code clean of all Samsung > proprietary license marks and threw GPL tags on it. > > When confronted with the issue; he came with the most unbelievable retort: > https://github.com/rxrz/exfat-**nofuse/issues/5<https://github.com/rxrz/exfat-nofuse/issues/5> > > This went as far as being posted on Phoronix as a legitimate driver: > http://phoronix.com/forums/**showthread.php?81642-Native-** > Linux-Kernel-Module-Is-Out-**For-Microsoft-exFAT<http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?81642-Native-Linux-Kernel-Module-Is-Out-For-Microsoft-exFAT> > > Clearly this is a breach of the most severe matter. Samsung has been made > aware of it, but there has been no response on the matter yet. I expect > nothing less than a DCMA takedown of the repository. > > "It's a leaked code of a proprietary exfat driver, written by Samsung, >> Inc. It works, you can use it. What else do you want, a signed paper from >> your parents on whether you can or can not use it? I'm a programmer, not a >> lawyer. You got the code, now decide what to do with it, it's up to you." >> > > What is wrong with such persons? This is insane. > > Andrei F. > >
