Hi Bradley, > I also think rxrz's actions in this matter were deplorable and > incorrect, mostly because rxrz's actions made it *more difficult* than > it would have been to resolve the matter to a good resolution.
It's annoying that rxrz slapped a GNU GPL licence on code that wasn't his. Kind of sullies the GPL by association. The repo still sits at github, along with its many fork-descendants. Github, understanding what he's done, still say that they will only remove them at the request of the copyright holder, and requested that they be contacted to file a DMCA take-down; http://help.github.com/dmca-takedown. Would there be someone at Samsung interested in doing this to tidy things up rather than leave a not-properly-released "GPL'd" version detracting from the pucker source? Presumably github zap all the descendants given the root repo. Cheers, Ralph.
