Messages by Thread
-
[License-discuss] I've been asked to license my open source project CC0
Shahar Or
-
Re: [License-discuss] resolving ambiguities in OSD (was [License-review])
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] resolving ambiguities in OSD [was Re: For Approval: License Zero Reciprocal Public License]
Rick Moen
-
[License-discuss] MakeHuman, CC0 and AGPL
Lindsay Patten
-
[License-discuss] Guidance for making license information available to users
Jesper Lund Stocholm
-
Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)
Tom Bereknyei
-
[License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
John Cowan
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Chris Travers
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Marc Jones
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
John Cowan
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Richard Fontana
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Stephen Michael Kellat
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Stephen Michael Kellat
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and the US Government
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
[License-discuss] Is Sun Identity Manager (Oracle Waveset) Open Source compliant ?
Ilona A.M. Fleck
-
[License-discuss] New maintainer, changing license?
Johnny A. Solbu
-
[License-discuss] NOSA 2.0?
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
[License-discuss] Some formerly-approved licenses not listed under opensource.org/licenses/ (was: SPDX License List v1.14 & OSI questions)
W. Trevor King
-
[License-discuss] Moderator Advice
Simon Phipps
-
[License-discuss] GPLv1?
Thorsten Glaser
-
Re: [License-discuss] FreeAndFair license
Lawrence Rosen
-
[License-discuss] EU Commission Publication of EUPL v1.2
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patents & interoperability
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
[License-discuss] OpenSSL License Change
Michael Dexter
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Tom Callaway
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Tom Callaway
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
John Cowan
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Richard Fontana
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Richard Fontana
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Marc Jones
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
John Cowan
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
[License-discuss] code.mil update
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
[License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Gervase Markham
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
David Woolley
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Richard Fontana
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Ben Tilly
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Stephen Kellat
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Tzeng, Nigel H.
-
Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: patent rights and the OSD
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Ben Tilly
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Lawrence Rosen
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Ben Tilly
-
Re: [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD
Christopher Sean Morrison
-
[License-discuss] Protecting database integrity
Terrence Bull
-
[License-discuss] [somewhat OT provocation] justifying the commercial no-discrimination clause
Luis Villa
-
[License-discuss] Possible alternative was: Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) Version 0.4.1
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)