license-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 RE: Copyright Ken Brown
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 RE: Copyright Wendy Seltzer
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright Ian Lance Taylor
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 RE: Copyright Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/10/24 BXAPL - request for comments Abe Kornelis
• 2002/10/24 RE: Copyright Ken Brown
• 2002/10/24 Re: A few here may have an opinion on this Forrest J Cavalier III
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright John Cowan
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright David Woolley
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright Ken Brown
• 2002/10/24 Re: Copyright Giacomo Catenazzi
• 2002/10/24 Copyright Sujita Purushothaman
• 2002/10/23 RE: Revised versions of the OSL and AFL Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/23 Re: Revised versions of the OSL and AFL Bruce Dodson
• 2002/10/23 Revised versions of the OSL and AFL Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/23 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval Julian Smart
• 2002/10/23 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval Lewis Collard
• 2002/10/23 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
• 2002/10/22 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
• 2002/10/22 Re: Fwd: Re: RPL version 1.1 Randall Burns
• 2002/10/22 Re: discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence Alain Désilets
• 2002/10/22 discuss: Request for wxWindows License approval Julian Smart
• 2002/10/22 RE: OSI certification mark and BSD licence Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 RE: OSI certification mark and BSD licence Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence Francis Hunt
• 2002/10/22 Re: OSI certification mark and BSD licence John Cowan
• 2002/10/22 URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL Barrister, musa yakubu (LLB).
• 2002/10/22 OSI certification mark and BSD licence Francis Hunt
• 2002/10/21 Re: Procedure for using an approved license John Cowan
• 2002/10/21 Re: Warranty Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/10/21 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
• 2002/10/20 RE: Procedure for using an approved license Casey Mitchell
• 2002/10/20 RE: Procedure for using an approved license Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/20 Warranty Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/20 Re: Fwd: Re: RPL version 1.1 Karsten M. Self
• 2002/10/18 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/18 OT: Re: Open Source Licence for my cms? David Johnson
• 2002/10/18 Re: Open Source Licence for my cms? Brendan Hide
• 2002/10/18 Re: Fwd: Re: RPL version 1.1 Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/10/18 Re: Open Source Licence for my cms? Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/10/18 Open Source Licence for my cms? Goran Svensson
• 2002/10/18 Re: Open Source Licence for my cms? Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/17 Re: Why is BSD OSI certified? John Cowan
• 2002/10/17 Re: Open Source Licence for my cms? John Cowan
• 2002/10/16 Re: Fwd: Re: RPL version 1.1 Randall Burns
• 2002/10/16 Re: Why is BSD OSI certified? Rod Dixon
• 2002/10/16 Re: Why is BSD OSI certified? John Cowan
• 2002/10/16 Re: RPL version 1.1 John Cowan
• 2002/10/16 Re: RPL version 1.1 Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/10/16 Spritekin Public License 1.0 Guillermo Rodriguez
• 2002/10/16 Re: Why is BSD OSI certified? Rod Dixon
• 2002/10/16 Re: Why is BSD OSI certified? John Cowan
• 2002/10/16 Why is BSD OSI certified? Alain Désilets
• 2002/10/15 RPL version 1.1 Randall Burns
• 2002/10/15 Re: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Nathan Kelley
• 2002/10/14 Re: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Karsten M. Self
• 2002/10/08 RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/08 RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/08 RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/07 Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Lewis Collard
• 2002/10/07 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/07 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/07 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Dave Nelson
• 2002/10/07 Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Russell Nelson
• 2002/10/06 RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/06 RE: Procedure for using an approved license Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/06 Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/10/06 Re: Procedure for using an approved license Bruce Dodson
• 2002/10/06 RE: Procedure for using an approved license James E. Harrell, Jr.
• 2002/10/06 Re: Procedure for using an approved license David Johnson
• 2002/10/06 Procedure for using an approved license Dave Nelson
• 2002/10/06 RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/06 RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/06 Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/10/04 RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd] Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/04 RE: Simplified Artistic License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/04 RE: Simplified Artistic License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/04 Re: Simplified Artistic License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/10/03 Re: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Lewis Collard
• 2002/10/03 Re: Simplified Artistic License David Johnson
• 2002/10/03 Re: Moral Rights Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Re: Create new license or use MPL? Rod Dixon
• 2002/10/03 RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/10/03 RE: Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 RE: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Create new license or use MPL? Henry Pijffers
• 2002/10/03 Re: Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise) Russell Nelson
• 2002/10/03 Re: Simplified Artistic License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 RE: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Russell Nelson
• 2002/10/03 RE: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Re: Fw: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application ServerOd) Lewis Collard
• 2002/10/03 Re: Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? Karsten M. Self
• 2002/10/03 Simplified Artistic License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Simplified Artistic License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/03 Fw: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? Rick Moen
• 2002/10/02 RE: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? James E. Harrell, Jr.
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? John Cowan
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? Lewis Collard
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? John Cowan
• 2002/10/02 Re: Partial OpenSource products/licenses? Mitchell Baker
• 2002/10/02 Partial OpenSource products/licenses? James E. Harrell, Jr.
• 2002/10/02 Re: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/10/01 RE: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Chris Gray
• 2002/10/01 RE: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Terrall,Tom
• 2002/10/01 Re: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Brendan Hide
• 2002/10/01 RE: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Terrall,Tom
• 2002/09/30 Re: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Rod Dixon
• 2002/09/30 Re: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/09/30 Re: discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Rod Dixon
• 2002/09/30 discuss: OCLC Office of Research Open Source License Russell Nelson
• 2002/09/30 Open Source in the Organization - Call for Papers Feller, Joe
• 2002/09/29 ADV: Website Promotion cactus32
• 2002/09/20 Correction (was: Re: discuss: Update for Submitted License) Nathan Kelley
• 2002/09/20 Re: discuss: Update for Submitted License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/09/20 Re: discuss: Update for Submitted License Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/09/19 discuss: Update for Submitted License Stefan Wachter
• 2002/09/12 Re: OSI approval of Plan 9 license Ralph Mellor
• 2002/09/12 Re: OSI approval of Plan 9 license John Cowan
• 2002/09/12 OSI approval of Plan 9 license Ralph Mellor
• 2002/09/12 XML DTD and open source licensing MAISONNY Benoit
• 2002/09/11 RE: Addendums to the LGPL Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/09/11 Re: Addendums to the LGPL David Johnson
• 2002/09/11 Addendums to the LGPL Kelvin Proctor
• 2002/09/10 eNetwizard Content Application Server License Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/09 RE: RPSL pre-discussion Rob Lanphier
• 2002/09/05 Re: discuss: Submitting_sosgpl_license David Johnson
• 2002/09/05 discuss: Submitting_sosgpl_license d.sureau
• 2002/09/04 Re: how NOT to form a contract? (second try) David Johnson
• 2002/09/04 how NOT to form a contract? (second try) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/09/04 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/04 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/04 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/09/04 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/09/04 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/04 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/09/03 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/03 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/09/03 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/09/01 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/08/31 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Nathan Kelley
• 2002/08/31 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/08/30 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/30 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Nathan Kelley
• 2002/08/30 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application John Cowan
• 2002/08/30 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/30 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application John Cowan
• 2002/08/30 Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Colin Percival
• 2002/08/30 RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/30 discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• 2002/08/30 Re: variable notification display req.'s Nathan Kelley
• 2002/08/29 Re: Query on a P2P EULA Seth Johnson
• 2002/08/29 variable notification display req.'s max privus
• 2002/08/29 Re: Query on a P2P EULA Nathan Kelley
• 2002/08/29 Re: Query on a P2P EULA Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/28 Query on a P2P EULA Seth Johnson
• 2002/08/27 Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/27 Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? James Michael DuPont
• 2002/08/26 Re: Mac Developers David Johnson
• 2002/08/26 Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? David Johnson
• 2002/08/26 Mac Developers Steve Mallett
• 2002/08/26 Re: Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Bjorn Reese
• 2002/08/26 Re: Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Alexandre Dulaunoy
• 2002/08/26 Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Alexandre Dulaunoy
• 2002/08/26 Re: Differences between LGPL and SISSL ? Danese Cooper
• 2002/08/26 Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? James Michael DuPont
• 2002/08/25 Differences between LGPL and SISSL ? Con Hennessy
• 2002/08/22 Re: license name arrogance Re: Academic Free License John Cowan
• 2002/08/22 Re: license name arrogance Re: Academic Free License Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/22 Re: license name arrogance Re: Academic Free License Bjorn Reese
• 2002/08/21 license name arrogance Re: Academic Free License Andy Tai
• 2002/08/21 Re: Academic Free License John Cowan
• 2002/08/21 Academic Free License Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/20 Re: Book of licenses Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/16 Re: Book of licenses Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/15 Internet Society on Digital Restrictions Management Seth Johnson
• 2002/08/15 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/15 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/14 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
• 2002/08/14 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]