license-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/14 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
• 2002/08/14 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/13 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/13 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/13 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/13 Illustrating how end-users see click-through and click-wrap notices Auke Jilderda
• 2002/08/13 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Brendan Hide
• 2002/08/12 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/12 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/12 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/12 Re: click once, accept all licenses. Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/11 RE: click once, accept all licenses. Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/11 Re: click once, accept all licenses. Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice David Johnson
• 2002/08/11 click once, accept all licenses. Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/11 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/11 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/11 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/10 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/10 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/10 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/10 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/08/10 Re: Alternative to click wrap license Sunnanvind Fenderson
• 2002/08/10 RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/10 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/10 Re: Alternative to click wrap license Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/10 Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bjorn Reese
• 2002/08/08 Re: Alternative to click wrap license Sunnanvind Fenderson
• 2002/08/08 Book of licenses Scott Fenton
• 2002/08/04 Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license Eric S Raymond
• 2002/08/04 RE: A practical example of a click-wrap license Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/04 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/04 Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license Eric S Raymond
• 2002/08/04 A practical example of a click-wrap license Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/04 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/04 Re: Open Software License Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Forrest J Cavalier III
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/03 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution 'Bruce Perens'
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/03 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
• 2002/08/03 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Michael St . Hippolyte
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/03 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
• 2002/08/02 RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
• 2002/08/02 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Tina Gasperson
• 2002/08/02 RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Nick Moffitt
• 2002/08/02 Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 John Cowan
• 2002/08/02 RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution M. Drew Streib
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/08/02 FW: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution M. Drew Streib
• 2002/08/02 Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 John Cowan
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
• 2002/08/02 OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/02 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Michael St . Hippolyte
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/01 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/01 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
• 2002/08/01 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Ian Lance Taylor
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template John Cowan
• 2002/08/01 Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
• 2002/08/01 Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/01 RPSL pre-discussion Rob Lanphier
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
• 2002/08/01 Open Software License Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/01 RE: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/01 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
• 2002/08/01 RE: question about the term "source" Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/08/01 question about the term "source" Svend Tofte
• 2002/07/30 Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/30 Re: ESST license Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/29 RE: ESST license Parson, Dale E (Dale)
• 2002/07/29 RE: ESST license Parson, Dale E (Dale)
• 2002/07/29 Re: ESST license Florian Weimer
• 2002/07/29 discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
• 2002/07/29 ESST license Parson, Dale E \(Dale\)
• 2002/07/28 Re: Open Software License version 1.0 Andy Tai
• 2002/07/28 Open Software License version 1.0 Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/07/28 Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/27 Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) Ken Arromdee
• 2002/07/27 discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) INTERNET ARMY Site Hosting Administrator
• 2002/07/25 thanks for helpful suggestions - (simple copyleft license template) Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/25 Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Michael St . Hippolyte
• 2002/07/25 Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Thatcher Ulrich
• 2002/07/22 license template for simple copyleft - seeking comments one last time Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/22 Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Michael St . Hippolyte
• 2002/07/21 Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Brian Behlendorf
• 2002/07/18 Re: GPL-like patent license Mark Shewmaker
• 2002/07/17 Re: GPL-like patent license Florian Weimer
• 2002/07/17 RE: GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
• 2002/07/17 RE: GPL-like patent license Vries Gerjon de
• 2002/07/17 Re: GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
• 2002/07/16 Re: GPL-like patent license Mark Shewmaker
• 2002/07/16 GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
• 2002/07/16 Re: open source applications with closed source components Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/15 Re: open source applications with closed source components Edwin Zacharias
• 2002/07/15 copyleft lite? - rev 3 Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/15 Re: open source applications with closed source components Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/15 open source applications with closed source components Edwin Zacharias
• 2002/07/15 Re: OOPS License 0.1 (GPL compatibility) Gerjon de Vries
• 2002/07/14 Re: [Open Source License] Suggest to add a quote to the Subject of the emails for easy classificaiton Carlos Cheng
• 2002/07/14 Re: OOPS License 0.1 Florian Weimer
• 2002/07/14 OOPS License 0.1 Gerjon de Vries
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Randy Kramer
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Bjorn Reese
• 2002/07/13 Re: copyleft lite? Andy Tai
• 2002/07/12 copyleft lite? Bruce Dodson
• 2002/07/09 Re: Academic Free License Rod Dixon
• 2002/07/09 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/09 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/09 RE: Academic Free License Ryan Ismert
• 2002/07/09 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Steve Lhomme
• 2002/07/08 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/07 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/07 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/07 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/07 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/05 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Nathan Kelley
• 2002/07/04 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Steve Lhomme
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Steve Lhomme
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Forrest J. Cavalier III
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Steve Lhomme
• 2002/07/03 Re: Approval request for BXAPL Nathan Kelley
• 2002/07/02 Approval request for BXAPL Abe Kornelis
• 2002/06/29 Re: UnitedLinux and "open source" Bjorn Reese
• 2002/06/27 Re: Academic Free License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/06/26 RE: [discuss] License Approval Request: Macromedia Open Source License Tom Harwood
• 2002/06/26 RE: Academic Free License Rod Dixon
• 2002/06/26 RE: Academic Free License Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/06/26 Re: Academic Free License Mahesh T Pai
• 2002/06/26 Re: Academic Free License John Cowan
• 2002/06/25 Academic Free License Lawrence E. Rosen
• 2002/06/23 Re: Licence Specified Inclusion Requisites... Adam Moss
• 2002/06/22 Re: Licence Specified Inclusion Requisites... David Johnson
• 2002/06/22 Re: Licence Specified Inclusion Requisites... David Johnson
• 2002/06/22 Re: Licence Specified Inclusion Requisites... Adam Moss
• 2002/06/21 Re: [discuss] License Approval Request: Macromedia Open Source Li cense Nathan Kelley
• 2002/06/21 Re: Revised Version of Public Scripting License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/06/21 Re: [discuss] License Approval Request: Macromedia Open Source License David Johnson
• 2002/06/21 Re: [discuss] License Approval Request: Macromedia Open Source License Nathan Kelley
• 2002/06/21 Re: [discuss] License Approval Request: Macromedia Open Source Li cense David Johnson
• 2002/06/21 Re: Licence Specified Inclusion Requisites... David Johnson

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]