license-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application John Cowan
  • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Nathan Kelley
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
  • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
  • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content ApplicationServer) Mahesh T Pai
  • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
  • Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Bruce Dodson
  • RE: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server) Robert Samuel White
• variable notification display req.'s max privus
  • Re: variable notification display req.'s Nathan Kelley
• Query on a P2P EULA Seth Johnson
  • Re: Query on a P2P EULA Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Query on a P2P EULA Nathan Kelley
  • Re: Query on a P2P EULA Seth Johnson
• Mac Developers Steve Mallett
  • Re: Mac Developers David Johnson
• Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Alexandre Dulaunoy
  • Re: Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Alexandre Dulaunoy
  • Re: Bounty Castle license and GNU GPL compatibility ? Bjorn Reese
• Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? James Michael DuPont
  • Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? David Johnson
  • Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? James Michael DuPont
  • Re: Can you under the GPL distribute executables without full sources? Mahesh T Pai
• Differences between LGPL and SISSL ? Con Hennessy
  • Re: Differences between LGPL and SISSL ? Danese Cooper
• Internet Society on Digital Restrictions Management Seth Johnson
• Illustrating how end-users see click-through and click-wrap notices Auke Jilderda
• click once, accept all licenses. Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: click once, accept all licenses. Carol A. Kunze
  • RE: click once, accept all licenses. Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: click once, accept all licenses. Mahesh T Pai
• Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bjorn Reese
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Mahesh T Pai
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Forrest J. Cavalier III
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Carol A. Kunze
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Rod Dixon
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Carol A. Kunze
  • RE: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice David Johnson
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Bruce Dodson
• Re: Alternative to click wrap license Sunnanvind Fenderson
  • Re: Alternative to click wrap license Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Alternative to click wrap license Sunnanvind Fenderson
• Book of licenses Scott Fenton
  • Re: Book of licenses Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Book of licenses Mahesh T Pai
• A practical example of a click-wrap license Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license Eric S Raymond
  • RE: A practical example of a click-wrap license Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license Eric S Raymond
• OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 John Cowan
  • Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
  • RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 John Cowan
  • RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
  • RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
  • RE: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Ken Arromdee
  • FW: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 Lawrence E. Rosen
• Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Ian Lance Taylor
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Michael St . Hippolyte
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Dodson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Open Source Click-Wrap Notice Brendan Hide
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Carol A. Kunze
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rick Moen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution M. Drew Streib
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution M. Drew Streib
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Nick Moffitt
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution John Cowan
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Michael St . Hippolyte
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution 'Bruce Perens'
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Rod Dixon
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Perens
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Russell Nelson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Tina Gasperson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution David Johnson
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Forrest J Cavalier III
  • Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution Bruce Dodson
• RPSL pre-discussion Rob Lanphier
  • RE: RPSL pre-discussion Rob Lanphier
• Open Software License Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Open Software License Mahesh T Pai
• question about the term "source" Svend Tofte
  • RE: question about the term "source" Lawrence E. Rosen
• discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
  • RE: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Russell Nelson
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template John Cowan
  • Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template Bruce Dodson
• ESST license Parson, Dale E \(Dale\)
  • Re: ESST license Florian Weimer
  • RE: ESST license Parson, Dale E (Dale)
  • RE: ESST license Parson, Dale E (Dale)
  • Re: ESST license Bruce Dodson
• Open Software License version 1.0 Lawrence E. Rosen
  • Re: Open Software License version 1.0 Andy Tai
• discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) INTERNET ARMY Site Hosting Administrator
  • Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) Ken Arromdee
  • Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) Bruce Dodson
• thanks for helpful suggestions - (simple copyleft license template) Bruce Dodson
• license template for simple copyleft - seeking comments one last time Bruce Dodson
• Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Michael St . Hippolyte
  • Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Thatcher Ulrich
  • Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) Michael St . Hippolyte
• GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
  • Re: GPL-like patent license Mark Shewmaker
  • Re: GPL-like patent license Florian Weimer
  • Re: GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
  • RE: GPL-like patent license Vries Gerjon de
  • RE: GPL-like patent license Paul Syverson
  • Re: GPL-like patent license Mark Shewmaker
• open source applications with closed source components Edwin Zacharias
  • Re: open source applications with closed source components Bruce Dodson
  • Re: open source applications with closed source components Edwin Zacharias
  • Re: open source applications with closed source components Bruce Dodson
• Re: OOPS License 0.1 (GPL compatibility) Gerjon de Vries
• Re: [Open Source License] Suggest to add a quote to the Subject of the emails for easy classificaiton Carlos Cheng
• OOPS License 0.1 Gerjon de Vries
  • Re: OOPS License 0.1 Florian Weimer
• copyleft lite? Bruce Dodson
  • Re: copyleft lite? Andy Tai
  • Re: copyleft lite? Bruce Dodson
  • Re: copyleft lite? Mahesh T Pai
  • Re: copyleft lite? Randy Kramer
  • copyleft lite? - rev 3 Bruce Dodson

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]