> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:55, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > > On 05.01.2017 23:42, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: >>>>> On 04.01.2017 15:01, Hans Åberg wrote: >>>>>> This is just a quirk of the 4/4 [meter], also mentioned in Hindemith, >>>>>> "Elementary Training", p. 30. In other words, the note should not cross >>>>>> the 2nd and 4th metric accents, but it can cross the [3rd]. >>> I’ve never heard of that and would assume it is a peculiarity in Hindemith. >>> Can anyone cite Gould or similar on the topic? >>> >>> Best, Simon >> Have Gould at hand, but I think it depends on interpretation of Gould p171 >> in the section on Syncopation >> >> <quote> >> The following common patterns are exceptions and should always be written as >> follows >> </quote> >> >> description of the image that follows for 4/4 time: >> crotchet minim crotchet and not crotchet crotchet tie crotchet crotchet >> >> does that hold for ‘minim in the middle of the measure’ or just for an exact >> crotchet minim crotchet measure? > > We are not talking about a simple syncopated rhythm like the one Gould lists > as an exception (!). Of course it’s perfectly normal to write 4 2 4 in 4/4 > time. > But if the note has to be split with a tie anyway, then it should be split > along the center of the measure first, unlike the NR hitherto did. > 8 4.~ 4 4 > not > 8 8~ 2 4
Hindemith has 8 8~ 2~ 8 8. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel