Hello,

On 11/01/17 16:44, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Trevor Daniels <tr...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
David Nalesnik wrote Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:22 PM


Ok, so I will probably do

git revert HEAD

in my staging branch

and push it to origin/staging.

-------

I won't attempt to clear the LSR queue in preparation for my patch
update (as I did) by running makelsr.py again.

When I update my issue, I'll simply add my snippet to snippets/new,
and leave updating the LSR to the future (when the frenched-score
snippet and my proposed snippet and whatever else appears will be
integrated)
Sorry my recipe caused a problem in this case.  Normally clearing
the old LSR queue first with makelsr.py would be fine.  But what
you suggest is also OK, as long as someone fixes the problem and
runs makelsr.py reasonably soon - before the next new snippet is
added (I can't run it myself - on my Windows Vista it always tries
to change all the \ to / or vice versa.)

I think the only problem is that @{MarkLines} should be replaced with
@code{MarkLines}.

I'm stuck in the middle of a make doc checking the change.  When I'm
through that, I'll revert the update.

Then I can push an update of the snippet to staging.  (But I'll save
the makelsr for later as James says.)

No problem, it's all a learning experience for me!

The staging merge runs every 4 hours - on my own server - so depending on when you eventually push to staging again, if you still see that staging hasn't been merged after (obviously) 4 hours it means something is wrong (or I suppose there could be a networking issue between the servers doing the merge and our git repo).

I deliberately don't configure my machine to send the merge success/fail emails because ... corp. IT reasons as you can tell these scripts to post something when they do fail, but I usually check manually in the mornings anyway and I can see on my server if the merge has failed. But obviously I failed to notice yesterday (it was 35 hours between staging update and merge) so it isn't an infallible system.

Regards

James

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to