"Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > David, you wrote Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:54 PM > >> You could try separate commands \voicifyUp and \voicifyDown . I am not >> sure whether or not \voicify should not be \voices or \voicing or >> \voicings instead, possibly making for nicer compounds like that. >> >> I mean, something like >> >> \voices 1,3,4 ... > > Although you later argued cogently against compounds like \voicesUp I > think \voices is a better choice than \voicify anyway, simply because > it expresses its operation more clearly (not sure what meaning the word > "voicify" would trigger in the mind - in Google it enables voice dictation; > in Twitter it applies a filter, for example). > > In other words \voices stands better than \voicify on its own merits.
I'll not stop the countdown for now but am going to commit with this change unless we get a conflicting view in which case it would make sense to stop the countdown and gather more opinions, possibly from the user list. Not sure what to name input/regression/voicify.ly instead, though. "voicify.ly" is clearly referring to the command, "voices.ly" is much more ambiguous. But at least it is not taken yet. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
