On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:40 -0700, thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote: > On 2017/07/15 07:25:37, richard_rshann.plus.com wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 00:09 -0700, mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > I'm afraid this patch does not fix the problem as wished. > > > You give an example of multiple bass figures on a note, I'm not sure > > what you would wish to see for that case, > > In > << > \relative c' { c1 c1 } > \figures { <6+>2 <6+>2 <6+>1 } > > I would expect same aligning for first and second BassFigure related to > the note. (understood: first and second *group* of bass figures)
That would be ok, although when you have multiple figures on a note allowing a bit more space for them can be good sometimes. You could always move the whole group along by inserting a short duration note with no figure in the bass figures if there was a particular case where this seemed obtrusive (hacky of course). So I think you could validly object that you didn't like them being treated differently. But that wouldn't justify sticking with the horrible effect you see when there is a single figure/lone accidental. Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
