Am 19.04.2017 um 05:00 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
it is a very longstanding tradition that open source projects are very modest in numbering releases, compared to commercial companies,
As a contrary example: the version numbers that Mozilla uses nowadays seem completely ludicrous. By the way, there have been different plans as to when LilyPond 3 should be released. At one time, it was supposed to follow the GLISS, which was sort-of called off. Now I think one condition would be a solution to the Guile v2 problem (be it even forking 1.8 or similar) and fixing the critical issues currently present.
Best, Simon _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
