alex
Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:05:01 -0800
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 17:25, _-¯-_ wrote: > who will more widely adopt it if you dont?
true. it can't take too long to tip the balance so that hardware mp3 players like ipods start getting .ogg support, especially now that the quality is better than the ancient mp3 standard. and if you base your new website strictly around mp3's now, your whole archive will be out of date when .oggs gain popularity. not that it's unpopular now... the soulseek clients support ogg metadata for example. if i were to use other's samples i would feel bad putting using any mp3 audio in recorded music... burning mp3s to audio cd is like creating a copy-protected cd, when you re-encode back to mp3 it's going to sound nasty, isn't it? ok slub will start encoding to .ogg from now on :] alex -- alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>