Thanks Mark. One PITA with the new naming scheme is that it is still different from LinTel as the WWN and LUN components are prefixed by 0x on s390x but not so on LinTel.
Neale On 4/26/17, 11:06 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Mark Post" <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU on behalf of mp...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/26/2017 at 09:43 PM, Neale Ferguson <ne...@sinenomine.net> >>>>wrote: >> What level of s390-utils changed the zFCP device naming from: >> >> ccw-<device_bus_id>-zfcp-<wwpn>:<lun> or >> ccw-<device_bus_id>-zfcp-<wwpn>:<lun>-part<n> >> >> >> to >> >> /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-<device_bus_id>-fc-<wwpn>-lun-<lun>-part<n> > >We had a bug reported against this for SLES12 SP2. It was against >systemd/udev. The version we have is udev-228. > >> (I assume it is a udev rule that does this - if so which one?) > >I can't find any specific rule that does this. I suspect the code that >did this is in src/udev/udev-builtin-path_id.c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
