Anonymous
Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:48:25 -0700
I think Richard has a point, namely, do we test for jargon? I can see why we should, but I don't see how. I, for one, would not trust an admin who didn't know the difference between an MUA and and MAU. It would be silly to have a separate test of just TLAs, but then dropping the TLAs into the other tests might be frowned upon. How is this handled in other tests? For M$, the only TLAs I remember seeing were product related (IIS, SMS, etc.). And JIC (just in case) you did't know, TLA means "Three Letter Acronym". :-) At 10:35 PM 6/24/99 -0400, Richard Rager wrote: >Ok I was reading bug-track tonight. <snip> ________________________________________________________________________ This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]