Re: Final Call - Recertification Concensus

[Stephen Holcomb]

I think that verbiage works.

Stephe Holcomb
----- Original Message -----
From: Forrest Tiffany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Final Call - Recertification Concensus


> Jared Buckley wrote:
> >
> > Well things appear to be settle on this particular topic, so without
> > further delay, "LAST CALL!"
> >
> > If you've got questions, comments, or concerns...let's hear 'em now
> >
> > Recertification:
> >
> > LPI will not require certificate holders to renew or recertify.  LPI
> > will provide to third parties, at the certificate holder's request,
> > information pertaining to the history of certifcations(s) passed, the
> > date the certification(s) were passed, and the revision date/level(s) of
> > the completed certification(s).  In providing this information, LPI
> > reserves the right to indicate the current revision level of any or all
> > of the certification(s) passed by the certificate holder and to issue
> > public advisories concerning changes in the content or objectives of the
> > certification(s).
> >
> > Jared
>
> I agree.
>
> Forrest
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To
unsubscribe:
> echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]