Re: Exam Renewal Concensus

[Chuck Mead]

On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Jared Buckley spewed into the bitstream:

> "A.R. (Tom) Peters" wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Dan York wrote:
> > 
> > > > LPI will review the contents of its test objectives and exams and revise
> > > > them as deemed necessary in order to provide for new material, test
> > > > validity, security, and to incorporate feedback.  Test objectives and
> > > > exams will not be reviewed less frequently than every two years.
> > >
> > > I agree... although I will say that there probably is some way to say
> > > that last sentence better... it took me about 5 minutes of thinking about
> > > it before I really understood that it actually means "Test objectives
> > > and exams will be reviewed at least every two years."
> > >
> > > Assuming that is the intent of the last sentence, I agree.
> > 
> >   On second thought, I would agree with Dan and refrase the final sentence
> > as:
> > "Test objectives and exams will be reviewed at least once in two years."
> 
> Ok. (Anybody else?)

I agree about the last sentence as well!

-- 
Chuck Mead, CTO, MoonGroup Consulting, Inc. <http://moongroup.com> 
Mail problems? Send "s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e mailhelp" (no quotes and no
hyphens) in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                              



________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]