On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:32:00PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > IIUC there's only a handful of VLAIS instances in LLVM code, why not
> Sorry, "kernel code", not "LLVM code".
> > just drop them for the sake of better code portability?
And what happens if someone else adds a variable thing like this
somewhere else, builds with gcc, everything's fine and patch gets
applied? Or something else llvm can't stomach.
Does that mean there'll be the occasional, every-so-often whack-a-mole
patchset from someone, fixing the kernel build with llvm yet again?
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.