On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
Hey Colin. Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a good thing to change possibly API dependent output in seq_ calls? > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c > b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c [] > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) > struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private; > > seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx); > - seq_printf(s, " Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id); > + seq_printf(s, " Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id); > seq_printf(s, " Cores [AE: %u SE: %u]\n", > ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores); > seq_printf(s, " Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);
