On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:40 +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/06/17 11:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > >
> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> > Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
> > good thing to change possibly API dependent output
> > in seq_ calls?
> Considering it's in -next and has not landed in upstream I supposed it
> was better to fix it now before it landed in Linus' repo.
Good call, thanks.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> > > b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> > 
> > > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > > struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
> > >
> > > seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> > > - seq_printf(s, " Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > > + seq_printf(s, " Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > > seq_printf(s, " Cores [AE: %u SE: %u]\n",
> > > ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
> > > seq_printf(s, " Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);