On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote:
>> Yeah, I'm not a big fan of having to change kernel code in order to
>> use the feature. I am quite intrigued by Geert Uytterhoeven's idea
>> to add a 'D' option to the config system, so that the record of which
>> modules to defer could be stored there. This is much better than
>> hand-altering code. I don't know how difficult this would be to add
>> to the kbuild system, but the mechanism for altering the macro would
>> be, IMHO, very straightforward.
>
> Straight forward but IMHO rather suboptimal. Sure it might be good
> enough if all you want is to ship products out the door, but for
> mainline something better should be done.
An alternative could be to add a processing step before linking,
changing the section name for initcalls you want to defer, based on a
small config file.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
