Bernd Eckenfels
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 18:49:09 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Timestamp is not a random number, so that probability of PAWS failure > does not depend on restricting it at all. The only thing which can help > to reduce probability is dropping all tpacket with ts_val==0 > or shutting down your machine while time of your peers passes through zero. 8) But Timestamps are not increased by one every packet, so the likelyhood that a wraparound a) happens and b) happens while a packet is send is realy small. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/