Hi Nick, On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:20:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:49:52 +1000 Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It could be this > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git/commit/?h=thin-ar&id=ec2c9c20f0efab37ae31de44fe0617aa61283905 > > > > kbuild: handle libs-y archives separately from built-in.o archives > > > > That touches the lib linking code regardless of CONFIG_THIN_ARCHIVE. > > You should be able to revert it by itself (which will break a few > > other archs, so you would also have to revert the default y patch > > for thin archives to repair your tree if this is the cause). > > Yeah, reverting that commit fixes the sparc64 build. (i have not done > that in today;s linux-next release, however).
But it broke the 32 bit sparc defconfig: arch/sparc/lib/strlen.o: In function `strlen': (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `strlen' lib/string.o:string.c:(.text+0x4b4): first defined here No unexpected, I expect :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
