Hi Sakari,
On 08/21/2017 03:53 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> Thanks for the update.
>> I've noticed that you added node labels to the child device nodes
>> in [0]:
>>
>> "as3645a_flash : flash" and "as3645a_indicator : indicator"
>
> The phandle references (as3645a_flash and as3645a_indicator) should
> actually be moved to the patch adding the flash property to the sensor
> device node. It doesn't do anything here, yet.
>
>>
>> I am still seeing problems with this approach:
>>
>> 1) AFAIK these labels are only used for referencing nodes inside dts
>> files and they don't affect the name property of struct device_node
>
> That's right.
>
>> 2) Even if you changed the node name from flash to as3645a_flash, you
>> would get weird LED class device name "as3645a_flash:flash" in case
>> label property is absent. Do you have any objections against the
>> approach I proposed in the previous review?:
>>
>>
>> snprintf(names->flash, sizeof(names->flash),
>> AS_NAME":%s", node->name);
>
> In the current patch, the device node of the flash controller is used,
> postfixed with colon and the name of the LED ("flash" or "indicator") if
> no label is defined. In other words, with that DT source you'll have
> "as3645a:flash" and "as3645a:indicator". So if you change the name of
> the device node of the I²C device, that will be reflected in the label.
>
> If a label exists, then the label is used as such.
>
> I don't really have objections to what you're proposing as such but my
> question is: is it useful? With that, the flash and indicator labels
> will not come from DT if label properties are undefined. They'll always
> be "as3645a:flash" and "as3645a:indicator", independently of the names
> of the device nodes.
>
Ah, indeed, the node->name is put in place of devicename segment and
the node points to the LED controller node. Neat approach, likely to
be adopted as a pattern from now on for all new LED class drivers.
For the patch going through media tree:
Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszew...@gmail.com>
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
