Re: [WSG] Site check andrewingram.net

[Andrew Ingram]

~davidLaakso wrote:
Andrew Ingram wrote:
Basically, anything you can think of (especially things that are an 
easy fix) would be most welcome.
http://www.andrewingram.net/
Andrew Ingram


Looking good and difficult to fault, Andrew.

With regard to nit-picking:
I think (fwiw) your nav may be breaking a little early with 
font-scaling in Gecko browsers.
The bock containing the 'skip' stuff in the header breaks right at 
text-size 'largest in ie/7.0.
The header is a little broken in ie/6.0 
<http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/andrew.gif>-- nevertheless 
the page is usable.

Best,
~dL
PS And you gotta know some imbecile is always going to try and 
validate your css when you ask for a site check :-) .

I've managed to fix the header in IE6 (it does some crazy stuff with 
line-height which overflow:hidden took care of), but I can't figure out 
a way to fix the similar problem with the skip links.  I agree about the 
nav breaking too early in Gecko, it's unfortunate that there aren't 
better ways of positioning text (oddly Internet Explorer 6 has the 
behaviour I want but Firefox doesn't).

I was uneasy about use the YUI CSS stuff because it doesn't validate, 
but in the end I decided that Fonts and Reset are too useful to ignore 
(I still dislike Grids though :))

- Andrew


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************