Andrew Ingram
Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:54:17 -0800
lisa fox wrote:
I agree with you to an extent, but i'm not keen on using a transitional doctype. Part of the purpose of the site is to demonstrate that I can achieve the effects people want within strict markup. I think that the icons i've provided should be enough clue as to the content, but i'm also going to be including an html version of the document - the two current links are so people can save a copy of my CV quickly (one of the other purposes of the site).Tim,Agreed. However, from a user-friendly perspective, it is very annoying to close a window and realise that you have lost where you were. This is where you make the decision on the purpose of the website, whether it is purely to display that you can comply with strict or whether it is for the user. Lisa
- Andrew ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************