listening-l  

Re: dangers of industrial animal production

greg vantongeren
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:07:27 -0700

 
Subject: Re: dangers of industrial animal production

>
>
>
>
> > > > > > gv: all of that addresses the field of the known in which egos
> > > > > > are thought to exist in time. From that belief there is action
> > > > > > according to self interest. I have my property, my job, my
> > > > > > family and I act to protect my vested interests. You appeal
> > > > > > to my reason and argue that protection of the environment is
> > > > > > in our collective interest and we need to organize our activities
> > > > > > so the needs of the group are best met. That is what the lawyer
> > > > > > in us would do...through logic devise a system to bring order to
> > > > > > social chaos. But that order is superimposed. It doesn't change
> > > > > > anything human at the root because as long as we experience
> > > > > > ourselves as separate in time we are divided and in conflict.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > rob: just a minute.  i am *not* appealing to your reason.
> > > > > > i am asking you to look at the problem.  of course in
> > > > > > using words and conversing with each other self-images
> > > > > > and images are involved. but i am not trying to convince
> > > > > > you of any argument or conclusion.  i only am saying:
> > > > > >     "here is a human problem, please look at this"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > gv: the problem of conflict of interest in human affairs has
> > > > > been looked at analytically from every angle, multi-layered
> > > > > bureaucracies formulated and detailed regulations of all
> > > > > manner of social, political and economic activity promulgated.
> > > > > And we keep reforming the rules and institutions.  Is that your
> > > > > interest, to discuss the need for social reformation?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > rob: i am more concerned with the quality of the looking
> > > > than with the quantity.  and my interest in that article
> > > > stemmed from my own experience in this matter.
> > > >
> > > > many do not realize the conditions in which animals live
> > > > and are slaughtered under in order to fill the grocery store
> > > > shelves and many of our stomachs.  many are not
> > > > aware of the hormones which are used, the antibiotics --
> > > > all which have important side-effects which are not fully
> > > > understood.  when we eat meat from the grocer's shelves,
> > > > we are ingesting these things too.
> > > >
> > > > many are not aware of how much fresh water
> > > > is consumed by animals mass produced by man for food.
> > > > it takes seven pounds of grain to produce one pound of beef.
> > > >
> > > > many are not aware how much waste these animals
> > > > create dailyb through defecation.  it is a real problem,
> > > > largely ignored.
> > > >
> > > > these animals live in conditions in which they cannot
> > > > move.  and corporate farming has taken over the
> > > > market. family farms are largely a thing of the past.
> > > >
> > > > many are not aware that it is possible to buy the meat
> > > > of animals raised without the use of hormones or anti-biotics,
> > > > animals which were allowed to roam relatively free.
> > > >
> > > > i am interested in people understanding what is happening.
> > > > *how* that understanding responds to the problem -- how it
> > > > does or does not involve government -- is not my main concern.
> >
> >
> > > gv: the mere knowledge that processed meat is not the most economical
> > > or healthy food to eat is not going to change well-entrenched cultural
> > > tastes and habits. As there are many carnivorous animals, species eating
> > > species is hardly unnatural. Smoking cigarettes and over-indulging in
> > > alcohol are more wasteful and pose a greater and more immediate health
> > > risk yet many still smoke and drink. Besides, getting caught up in
> issues
> > > or causes distracts from the real problem which is human consciousness.
> >
> >
> > rob: alcohol and cigarettes represent a greater and
> > more immediate health risk to the individual user,
> > but industrial animal production represents a
> > danger to all human beings.  i am not talking about
> > meat eating in general.  i am talking about buying meat
> > which is produced in these factory farms. and as most
> > people are ignorant of the issues involved and the
> > availability of organic meat which is produced
> > in a way which affords the affected animals a higher
> > quality of life and which does not involve anti-biotics
> > and growth hormones.
>
> > this problem, it seems to me, reflects the fact that we as
> > the public too easily accept what is marketed to us as safe,
> > and we fail to look into the very misguided and non-sustainable
> > ways in which we are inter-acting with this earth.
> >
> > are you saying that we should ignore these problems and
> > just meditate?  :-))
>
>
> gv: the world of cause and effect is too much with us. People are
> concerned about their needs first and everything else is secondary.
>
>
> rob: when people see that their needs are tied into
> global needs, they respond accordingly.  polls show
> for example that abouyt 80% of Americans are willing
> to pay higher costs for environmentally responsible energy
> than for forms which are more environmentally destructive.
>
>
> gv: To motivate people to change, you show them how change
> is in their best interest as it will bring security, comfort or pleasure.
> A goal-oriented approach that is geared toward idealistic or altruistic
> ends doesn't work as it is at odds with human nature. Meditation as
> we use the term here is not linear or utilitarian in the sense of trying
> to bring about a result. There is psychologically no tomorrow, no
> collective world of man to save. There is only this moment.
>
>
> rob: yes, i was using meditation in the contrived sense of
> being a dualisticly employed method as a joke -- as a foil
> for embracing a failure to act.  [:-)]
gv: if we compiled a list of pressing issues to be addressed, 
it could be a mile long... animal rights, woman's rights, a
multitude of environmental concerns, equal opportunity
for this group or that, political freedom on my little island,
the right to bear arms or the need to get guns off the street,
free speech, anti-defamation, tax the rich and feed the poor,
get out and vote, stop one of a hundred of dread diseases,
reform every human institution to end the terrible waste and 
injustice blah blah blah...As we 'should' give attention to the
problem of human consciousness at every level, we better
get busy. We can start by embracing our pet peeves. ;-)