Scott Barnes
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:43:09 -0700
The implementation more so. It’s also not just about the runtime, at the end of the day TCO is quite strong driving factor in this ethos, so having the technical prowess is one thing, holding it hostage to price..now that’s where technology decisions make or break.
As at the end of the day, end consumer really doesn’t care – i.e. “Which is better HD TV maker Samsung or Sony? “ – answer “whichever’s the cheapest, has the best warranty” as once you get to the HD levels, 1 in 5 house wives can’t spot the difference.. :D From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Connors Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:33 PM To: listserver@ozsilverlight.com Subject: Re: [OzSilverlight] RE: Hardware accelerated video? On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: In terms of what Flash has, they 10 added hardware bitmap compositing. Verdict is still out on how good it is in reality. Do you mean the verdict is still out on how good their implementation is or whether or not it is a good idea fullstop? -- David Connors ([EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Software Engineer Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com<http://www.codify.com> Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417 189 363 Address Info: http://www.codify.com/contact ------------------------------------------------------------------- OzSilverlight.com - to unsubscribe from this list, send a message back to the list with 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Powered by mailenable.com - List managed by www.readify.net ;4�����(!��&������r��y����b�X��ǧu���Ơy����-��b��"�����r��y�-��.n7���0z��o)��W�i�^r����fjv�y��� +y�b)�