Philip Newton
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 02:16:49 -0700
Leo Lapworth wrote: > 2) Oh, yea, make your designers code and your coders design, > that'll make for a good site - honest. Though if the designers have some idea of what is and what isn't possible/easy to implement, maybe we wouldn't have so many image roll-overs, blank one-pixel GIFs, tables within tables withing tables, etc. > 3) "see the web through users' eyes" - easy, they can't all > see it - does that mean you don't have to do anything ? "Users will say: I don't have Flash and don't want to download it. Therefore, I should leave out the Flash bits of the site. Users will say: I read that JavaScript can expose security holes, so I'll turn it off. Therefore, I will make all my navigation work without JavaScript turned on." Sounds like a good idea to me so far. Cheers, philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.