Re: eLyXer integration, round two

[Pavel Sanda]

Sam Liddicott wrote:
> as an example:
> If Richard requires changes that Alex will not meet, then Lyx will suffer, 
> not Alex and not Richard.

i am sorry but i completely disagree. Richard is trying to keep the code
maintanable and clean. this value may become clear only when you try to
fix bugs of others people, not ujust hack something for this moment.

avel