Am 19.09.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>: > > 2017-09-19 15:29 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller <sp...@lyx.org>: > 2017-09-19 14:46 GMT+02:00 Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>: > Am 19.09.2017 um 14:34 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker <t...@lyx.org>: > What’s the benefit of using internal hunspell? Is it an fallback option? > > For Linux, yes. But I think hunspell was not that commonly distributed when > we implemented it.
For Linux it should be the packagers call to distribute hunspell or not. Without the dictionary files its senseless anyway. The developer may download it if it’s not part of the distribution she is working on. Of course the included 3rdparty tree makes this easier. > See > > https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg152695.html > > For the history of the inclusion, also see > https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg150782.html I think this one is an interesting page: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/introduction/libraries.html Stephan
