Am Montag, 25. September 2017 um 16:12:08, schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net> > Am 25.09.2017 um 15:00 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: > > > > Am Montag, 25. September 2017 um 14:33:04, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > > <for...@lyx.org> > >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:31:45AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> Le 25/09/2017 à 08:26, Stephan Witt a écrit : > >>>> Now I wonder if it would be better to name the utility lyxconvert. > >>>> It will be installed in /usr/local/bin or something like that? > >>> > >>> I was about to suggest this. And then do we want to honor version-suffix? > >>> I > >>> guess not, but we might end up installing several utilities with the same > >>> name. > > > > I'd say yes. The problem arises with package manager if I want different > > lyx-versions installed. > > ATM, I have lyx2.1, lyx2.2, lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 installed without conflicts. > > The version-suffix needs to be passed to or be part of convertDefault.py then?
Either way. I prefer it be part of convertDefault.py. This could be created
from convertDefault.py.in.
> Stephan
>
> > Cmake for debian seems (still) to be complicated in respect of creating
> > multiple distinct packages
> > needed for e.g. common lyx data.
> >
> >> Indeed. Maybe a specific install target would solve this. I mean it could
> >> be installed only if one explicitly issues "make install-lyxconvert".
> >>
> >
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
