-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 29 March 2003 20:09, Dan Armak wrote:
> If I'm right, it is caused by encoding info problems. The bakoma fonts, for
> reference, are encoded as "ISO 10646-1 (Unicode, BMP)" (according to 
pfaedit)
> and have the correct unicode numbers attached to the various glyphs. The
> bluesky fonts OTOH have the (apparently) unicode glyph names, but don't have
> the numbers (pfaedit shows most characters as U+????). The question is,
> assuming I'm right, how to get those numbers there.

I've tried saving a type1 font (.pfb) in unicode encoding and pfaedit told me 
type1 only supports 1-byte encodings. Which I don't fully understand, because 
the bluesky fonts have more than 256 characters each, again according to 
pfaedit.

It seems the merging of cmr into the other fonts made a mishmash of the 
encodings, but even without the merging I can't get it to work right. If 
there's anyone around who knows fonts, of you know of the 'right' place to 
ask for help, please tell.

- -- 
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Matan, Israel
Public GPG key: http://www.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+hdwXUI2RQ41fiVERAvr+AJ9HxJwKh38UUzKX0O2mG5ZYnKcduACePsEt
VFDvCAWpm07yNQXZvyvfW94=
=vSrh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to