lyx-users  

Re: How to Spot a Word Processed Book

Steve Litt
Wed, 09 May 2007 11:44:26 -0700

On Wednesday 09 May 2007 14:23, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Interesting article:
> > How to Spot a Word Processed Book
>
>    What jumps out at me when I look at a processed word book is the uneven
> spacing between words on each line. The interletter and interword spacing
> on a typeset page is much more subtle and the white space doesn't jump off
> the page as a distraction.
>
>    Of interest, perhaps, in light of the referenced web page is that
> O'Reilly & Associates insist that their authors submit copy in MS Word
> format. Considering the support ORA provides to the open source community,
> and the prevalent use of TeX/LaTeX/LyX among linux users and writers, that
> publisher won't accept camera-ready, typeset copy. A good friend of mine
> was frustrated tremendously at having to re-do her book in OO.o to save it
> as a .doc file. When I wrote Tim O'Reilly to ask why they have that policy
> he never responded.

Hi Rich,

I think I know why they want it in (barf) MS Word.

Big publishers like O'Reilly (or in the case of my Samba Unleashed, Sams) take 
complete control of the book's layout. Working with a mainstream publisher is 
the ultimate WYSIWYM experience -- you as the author are responsible only for 
content. Your publisher gives you a list of styles you may (and must) use and 
a stylesheet telling how and when to use them. You do that, and the publisher 
takes care of the rest.

If the publisher were to accept a LyX document (or LaTeX), they'd either need 
to accept the author's layout (bad idea when you publish a uniform series 
like Unleashed or Nutshell), or they'd need to translate back into MS Word 
with appropriate styles.

Another reason they use MS Word is because MS Word has facilities to track 
changes, so the chapter documents that keep getting sent back and forth 
contain a complete history of queries, reponses and changes.

Of course, one could ask "why not make LyX the official "wordprocessor" 
instead of MS Word, and supply a LyX layout instead of a MS Word style 
template. The answer is simply that it's very hard to find willing and 
qualified authors for the amount mainstream publishers are willing to pay, 
and it would be far easier to get the few LyX/LaTeX users to switch to MS 
Word than to get the multitudes of MS Word users to switch to LyX, which many 
haven't heard of, don't have, and don't know how to install.

Your friend was in the minority of published authors who had already completed 
her book before "getting published". I cannot imagine what a horrendous 
hassle it would be to convert one of my books to MS Word, so I feel her pain. 
But for people like I was when I wrote Samba Unleashed, using MS Word with 
their stylesheet was trivially easy. And of course, in 1999-2000, every 
author had MS Word.

SteveT
 
Steve Litt
Author: Universal Troubleshooting Process books and courseware
http://www.troubleshooters.com/