Leofranc Holford-Strevens
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:57:02 -0800
Leofranc Holford-StrevensIn message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rosemary Grayston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Finding a literary origin for the Golden Bough has been very difficult, as is generally acknowledged. Servius, as I remember, says that the image comes from Pythagoras' belief that the bough or Y-shape represents the sharp divergences of fate. This is interesting but fails to say anything about gold. The only clear verbal parallel comes as far as I know from Garland, a poem by Meleager of Gadara who died about when V was born and who was quite well known: the golden branch of the ever-divine Plato, shining all through with virtrue. Mackail, who worked on both Meleager and V, remarks that this is one of the best-ever few-word critical judgements, assuming that the great Plato not some lesser poet of the same name is meant, and that it might have contributed to V's conception of the Bough - David West makes this phrase the key to a Platonist interpretation of much of the Katabasis story. For my less qualified part I find it hard to think that V did not know of Meleager's phrase; moreover we are aware that V, from his treatment of Berenice's Lock of Hair, which left Berenice's head as unwillingly as Aeneas left Dido's realm, was well prepared to take Hellenistic phrases which had been merely charming and turn them into something much more stern and dramatic. Perhaps the word charming underestimates Meleager, but I would think in spite of Mackail's praise that M was not really trying to be profound. His theme is the association of a series of poets with a series of flowers and fruits making the Garland: quite common botanical things, like violets, spurge, cyclamen and pears. When he comes to Plato does his golden branch come from a mythical or supernatural context unlike all the other ones? Or is he again referring to something quite common? The obvious candidate seems to me to the plant we know as Golden Rod, solidago virgaurea, which does have a pleasantly bright appearance and also has inner goodness in form of medicinal properties (good for kidney stones, apparently). The point I was thinking of is that if V is exploiting an inherited, rather charming, comparison of Plato to a common garden flower he is also transforming the idea that he inherits, raising it to another plane, and one should not assume that he retains from the tone of his original an uncritically flattering view of political Platonism. How nice it would be to find another source that took us out of the garden and into a rather more sacred and mythological realm where V's Bough seems to belong. Unless Meleager is using his anthology to encode some deeper ideas. - Martin Hughes
-- *_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_* Leofranc Holford-Strevens 67 St Bernard's Road usque adeone Oxford scire MEVM nihil est, nisi ME scire hoc sciat alter? OX2 6EJ tel. +44 (0)1865 552808(home)/353865(work) fax +44 (0)1865 512237 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) *_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To leave the Mantovano mailing list at any time, do NOT hit reply. Instead, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message "unsubscribe mantovano" in the body (omitting the quotation marks). You can also unsubscribe at http://virgil.org/mantovano/mantovano.htm#unsub